Cardboard Gold from Junk Wax

11 10 2009

Call me crazy if you must but I love everything about Topps’ 1984 design. While it’s fair to say that it hasn’t aged incredibly well, it’s still one of the most unique and memorable releases in Topps’ history, in my opinion. Yes, 1983 had a similar design, it just didn’t work as well.

If by chance you completed the 1984 Topps 792-card set, you also had a chance to pick up the identical O-Pee-Chee release from that year which had close to 400 cards in the set. Now if you’re really a compulsive completist, there is also a 792-card set with the same design and photography released under the Nestle name.

These cards weren’t cards at all but uncut sheets. According to legend, some individuals bought most of the 4,000 produced sheets and cut them up to be sold as singles. Sports Collectors Digest lists the single cards with a higher book value with cards from sheet A (of six) being worth $60 a piece.

On eBay, a complete 1984 Nestle set just sold for under $80 dollars. Today, you can buy a full 1984 Topps set for under $10 dollars. If money is no option, there is also a 792-card set of Tiffany, which featured high-gloss finish on the front of each card. An ’84 Topps Tiffany graded Mattingly recently sold for $500 dollars.

Who says all 80’s releases are junk?

1984 Nestle


Actions

Information

12 responses

11 10 2009
chemgod

The Tiffany sets are the only non junk. I have 5 of the 10 tiffany sets from the 80s.

11 10 2009
Paul

I’m glad I’m not the only one who likes the 1984 Topps design.

11 10 2009
GrandCards

I’m partial to the 84 set too, although I think the Tigers’ world series championship probably had something to do with that.

11 10 2009
R-

So hideous, but in a good way. Just like the woodgrain 87 borders!

11 10 2009
VOTC

Not as good as ’83 but a good set.

11 10 2009
night owl

’83 Topps was the best base set design of the ’80s. Topps must’ve realized that because it basically issued more of the same in ’84. I like the ’84 design better than most, but it’s a knock-off of ’83 (which is a knock-off of ’63).

11 10 2009
toolboxroom

I have always loved the ’84 Topps design. I think I favor it due to two of my favorite players as a kid having their RCs in this set. It may be cliched to say, but ’84 is just so wonderfully 80’s. I also really like the color combo on the back of the cards, something that is often overlooked.

’83 Topps may be a better design, but ’84 is tops in my book.

11 10 2009
WASS

Did Nolan smoke a bowl before he took that pic?

Also ’84 was a great set but I still prefer ’83 to ’84. I guess I am sucker for those Super Veteran cards.

11 10 2009
Kevin

I still have my nestle’s sheet, it is the one with all the good players on it. My mom must of saved up for months to get it for me.

Kevin

12 10 2009
Greg A.

80’s designs are better than the new stuff in general because they keep it SIMPLE. Though I have to disagree in that ’83 is far more elegant design….

12 10 2009
SteveTX

I’ve purchased a couple single uncut sheets of ’84 Topps off Ebay. I don’t recall either of them having the Mattingly or Ripken cards, so they ended up pretty cheap–about $10 each.

12 10 2009
mfw13

One of my favorite 1984 sets is the Topps 5×7’s….same design as the regular cards but much bigger and therefore great for autographs. You can find boxes on Ebay for $5-10 each and are guaranteed a bunch of HOFers unless the box has been searched. Also love the 1988 Topps…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: